Rogate and Rake
Neighbourhood Development Plan
Potential development sites background paper
Potential development sites within the Parish
BACKGROUND PAPER
Whilst the decision has been made not to allocate any sites for development in the Rogate and Rake
Neighbourhood Development Plan, and instead defer this decision to the emerging SDNP Local Plan,
the process was used to undertake a further assessment of all potential development opportunities
in the Parish. In turn this process will serve more than one purpose:
It has allowed Rogate and Rake Parish Council an understanding of the full range of
available, deliverable and, equally importantly, suitable sites available for future housing
growth in the Parish. The assessment has confirmed that there are indeed sufficient sites
available to accommodate the planned development growth over the Plan period;
It will also allow Rogate and Rake Parish Council to make an informed submission to the
future local plan when consulted on the issue of preferred sites for development;
In addition the assessment of sites and their relative constraints has allowed Rogate and
Rake Parish Council a full understanding of the types of general policies that would continue
to support suitable levels of growth in the Parish whilst ensuring any new development is in
keeping with the rural qualities of our settlements.
This document deals with two types of development site within the Parish as follows:
Sites identified by the SDNPA Strategic Housing Availability Assessment
Other relevant sites not identified by the SDNPA Strategic Housing Land Availability
Assessment
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) sites are identified and then generally
assessed for their suitability and deliverability by the Local Planning Authority in order to meet a
statutory requirement to demonstrate sufficient land is available for new housing for a period of 5
years looking forward.
The following paper has considered all current known SHLAA sites along with others arising from the
neighbourhood plan’s community consultations and deliberations. Some of the following sites have
previously been recorded and assessed for suitability by the SDNPA. At the same time the
neighbourhood plan making process and its empowerment of the community to being to define
sustainable development in the context of the Parish allowed the steering group to undertake their
own assessment of the merits of the land available.
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA)
Sites for potential housing development have been submitted to Chichester District Council and
SDNPA for consideration as follows:
The following section analyses the sites detailed on pages 193 210 of the SDNPA Strategic
Housing Land Availability Assessment (“SHLAA”), released in February 2014 (see Appendix).
Existing SHLAA sites around Rogate
The NP concludes that there are three SHLAA sites and [ ] non-SHLAA sites which might, subject
to several caveats set out below, offer possible areas where sustainable strategic housing
development might take place in the Parish over the life of the NP.
The narrative below is the NP Steering Committee’s careful assessment of the SDNPA SHLAA
analysis within the Parish. Each site that is considered is numbered as follows on the
accompanying plans:
This section deals first with the designated SHLAA sites:
Site of no. 1-4 Parsonage, Rogate
The site is located at the western entrance, Rogate. The good accessibility of the site makes it
appropriate for redevelopment but on a constrained basis (see below) with smaller, single
storey dwellings, community amenities public open space and some additional residents
parking, subject to a full landscape and visual impact assessment appropriate for this key site.
This is already a developed site and has long-standing unimplemented planning application for
8 open market dwellings plus 8 affordable dwellings. This NP considers that any re-
development of the site requires a significantly more restrained approach from that currently
proposed, due to the landscape and visual impact of this prominent site at the western
gateway to the village of Rogate.
Any measured development should respect the historic character of nearby buildings and make
more appropriate use of a very accessible location within easy walking distance to the village
facilities, bus stops and retail outlets. The NP and local residents consider the site of strategic
importance and is therefore appropriate as a SHLAA site for a limited number of smaller-sized
dwellings perhaps as mixed tenure dwellings.
Any proposal must unequivocally contribute to the alleviation to localised traffic congestion,
sewer capacity shortcomings and localised flooding in the neighbourhood. It is recognised, for
instance, that the site might provide useful parking within its scheme design (a key Parish
concern as evidenced by the NP Questionnaire and given the site’s strategic proximity to both
Rogate shop and school). Any development on this site must incorporate appropriate traffic
and parking measures that helps the wider village requirements. A safe crossing of the A272
should be in place before occupancy of the development.
CHI07 Parsonage Field to south, Rogate
Community consultations have shown that this site is considered inappropriate for housing
development. The Parsonage area is widely considered over-developed, poorly served by
parking/traffic measures and sewage infrastructure and generally inappropriate for any new building
proposals. Indeed, the NP process has identified that improvements to the site’s overall drainage is a
Parish priority and is covered in the Action Plan to this document.
CHI06 Parsonage Field to southwest, Rogate
Community consultations have shown that this site is prone to regular flooding and is considered
inappropriate for housing development. The Parsonage area is widely considered over-developed,
poorly served by parking/traffic measures and sewage infrastructure. Not therefore appropriate.
CHI04 Parsonage grounds to west, Rogate
Community consultations have shown that this site that is overlooking open access land is
considered inappropriate for housing development. Again, the Parsonage area is widely considered
over-developed and poorly served by parking/traffic measures and sewage infrastructure. Probably
not appropriate for any new building proposals.
CHI08, Parsonage housing plots at western entrance, Rogate
This site is already developed and one of the two existing dwellings has recently received planning
consent for two additional open market housing. The NP considers this entire site of strategic
importance to the Parish given its prominent position and its accessible location that is within easy
walking distance to the village facilities, bus stops and retail outlets.
The NP concludes that this site warrants a more sympathetic, more integrated re-development than
is currently proposed, provided that traffic congestion, localised flooding and measures for the safe
crossing of the A272 are first put in place. The NP concludes that priority here should be given to
smaller units, in particular given its proximity to Rogate village amenities, to units for the elderly or
young. Subject to conditions, the site is therefore an appropriate development candidate. In
particular, parking mitigation must be included in any workable proposal especially given school
traffic at this site.
CHI10, Garage units on Parsonage site, Rogate
Site of redundant, poor quality and ill-maintained vehicle garages, some still in use, but considered
by the NP as a site warranting redevelopment through a community led-scheme, whether for
housing or for other types of redevelopment (for example, work units, meeting place and open
space, nursery, Men’ Sheds or district heating scheme). Subject to conditions, the site is therefore
considered an appropriate development candidate. Any alternative uses must, however, address the
visual impact on many neighbouring properties overlooking the site, parking and traffic congestion
and mitigation (the NP process has, for instance, solicited comments that the site should be made
over in its entirety to car-parking), and the need for improved community amenities and
employment opportunities in the area. Any development must be preceded by general drainage and
infrastructure/sub-station improvements to the area. The site may also be appropriate as a
Community Hub but the NP concludes that thorough consultation with neighbouring units is
required before any final use can be agreed.
CHI05, small field north of A272 opposite Parsonage, Rogate
This field had been suggested as a potential candidate site for village extension but its significant
implications on visual impact and traffic render this inappropriate for further consideration.
CHI09, Field north of Garbetts Lane and south of A272, Rogate
The NP considers this an important strategic site at the eastern entrance to Rogate village and
conservation area. It is inappropriate, however, to consider the field on its own. Instead, the site is
reviewed below in conjunction with the existing Renault garage and contiguous paddock land to its
south (see below).
Housing - Existing SHLAA sites - around Rake
CHI11 B2070 field on eastern edge of Rake
The site was considered during the community consultations as a potential site while acknowledging
that any such new build would extend the existing ribbon development along the B2070. The visual
impact of this site would be significant, the site has been rejected by the SDNPA SHLAA exercise and
is therefore inappropriate for development given the NP’s overarching requirement to maintain the
Parish’s rural character and special qualities.
The site is also located 400 metres from two SSSI sites that would be vulnerable to increased visitor
disturbance. Housing development on this site at the strategic eastern entrance to a rural Parish
would, moreover, alter significantly the landscape character of the area, resulting in over 3kms of
continuous and unacceptable ribbon development along both sides of the B2070. In summary,
therefore, the whole site is therefore considered currently inappropriate for development.
CHI12 Wooded site off the B2070 near the eastern edge of Rake
The site contributes to the wooded landscape character of this part of the Parish with significant
public amenity of views along the B2070 over its woodland setting framing open countryside. The
site backs onto the curtilage of a number of dwellings and development here would significantly
alter the amenity of neighbouring properties. A restricted access to the site onto the B2070 running
between residential properties would have a detrimental effect on the amenity of both properties.
Development on this site is therefore considered inappropriate.
The NP therefore considers that SDNPA’s SHLAA assessment of February 2015 is largely correct
in rejecting the majority of existing SHLAA sites in the Parish. However, the NP disagrees with
the SDNPA’s assessment that two existing SHLAA sites in the Parish are suitable for housing
development:
(1) Site CHI04 at Hugo Platt, Rogate, is a greenfield site inappropriate for housing
development, given that Hugo Platt/Parsonage area is widely considered to be over-
developed, poorly served by parking/traffic measures and sewage infrastructure; and
(2) Site CHI10 at Parsonage, Rogate currently provides parking for local residents, an
important local amenity which should be retained. The site is inappropriate for any
wholesale development given that the area is already over-developed with poor
infrastructure. The site could, however, accommodate up to two single-storey
dwellings while offering community amenity and/or facilities such as improvements to
the foul drainage infrastructure, parking and public open space. Such improvements
would make the site appropriate for selective and measured development over the
course of the NP in consultation with the site’s surrounding neighbours. This is dealt
with below.
Road site between Primrose Lane and Flying Bull Pub, Rake
The area is located on the north side of A2070, Rake, is judged appropriate for development
with some limited scope for sympathetic in-fill development. This site has scope for small-scale
housing development in association with improvements to the public realm. The site is located
close to amenities, public transport and employment areas.
Housing Other possibilities in the Parish (currently non- SHLAA
sites)
The NP exercise identified a selection of other possible Parish sites (not already identified in the
SDNPA SHLAA exercise) and concluded as follows:
Site surrounding Rogate recreation Ground NP-01
This site was considered a candidate development site during NP community consultation exercise.
The NP recognises that that this proved to be a controversial site as it raised many concerns about
traffic on North Street, loss of public amenity, parking, more appropriate alternative uses for
community benefit, retail or services, and the loss of important views to the north and east over
open countryside. For the avoidance of doubt, the NP therefore considers that the site is
inappropriate for development or for inclusion at present within the LPA’s SHLAA. It may be that the
area is appropriate for appropriate provision of additional recreational facilities.
Figure 1: SHLAA NP-01 Rogate Recreation Ground
Infill site within built area of Fyning Lane NP-02
Fyning Lane was also nominated during the community consultation exercises although with strong
reservations over the current condition and capacity of the public highway, access, traffic flow and
infrastructure to accommodate any further development. Following the NP’s public consultation
process, the site is considered inappropriate for development or for inclusion within the LPA’s
SHLAA. Indeed, the SDNPA’s exercise has already vetoed the area. Traffic, power, sewerage,
infrastructure, parking and massing considerations make development in Fyning Lane generally
inappropriate. Furthermore, the Lane’s southern side currently provides a welcome wildlife border
from the A272 to the woodland at Terwick Common. Any future new consideration of Fyning Lane
should also be contingent upon first addressing traffic concerns and infrastructure.
Figure 2: SHLAA NP-02 Fyning Lane infill site
Clayton Court, fronting B2070 at Hill Brow NP-03
Clayton Court, fronting B20970 at Hill Brow:
The site was proposed by the NP as a SHLAA site, which should be considered in conjunction
with the proposed Liss Neighbourhood Plan and the needs of this neighbouring community.
The site includes a locally important historic building, with extensive grounds on a contained
site potentially suitable for mixed used development to enable community benefits across the
Parish.
Clayton Court was nominated during the community consultation exercises due to its very good
accessibility to the public highway, proximity to enterprise and employment opportunities,
amenities and public transport. The location is in an already built area that does, however, back
on to locally important woodland.
Nevertheless, sympathetic development should only cause limited visual impact. It is a large
contained site with historic building and outbuildings that might be appropriate in due course for
alternative and mixed use purposes including employment and should therefore be considered in
the LPA’s SHLAA as a mixed development scheme.
NP-04 and NP-05 Opportunistic infill sites located in on both sides of
the B2070 between Bull Hill and the Jolly Drover Public House
Development is considered inappropriate in the narrow area between Bull Hill and the Jolly Drover
Public House. Any such development would constitute an unacceptable change to the rural
character of the area and create additional unwelcome ribboning. Any such change was also not
supported by the Questionnaire findings, would threaten the nearby SSSII, would cause pressure on
the weak power and water supplies of London Road and would also be inconsistent with the NP
assessment of SHLAA site CHI11. Development in this area would also occasion unwelcome
additional traffic entries onto the B2070. In addition, the stretch on the southern side of the B2070
centred on Oliver’s Piece between Hatch Lane and Primrose Lane where outstanding views over
open country side should be protected for the public amenity. It is noted that recent infilling in this
area has not been successful.
Between Primrose Lane and the Flying Bull Public House
The limited area on the north side of the B2070 between Primrose Lane and the Flying Bull Public
House is considered appropriate for limited and sensitive development subject to the caveats
contained in this plan.
NP-06 Parsonage housing plots at western entrance, Rogate
This is already a developed site and has long-standing planning application for eight open market
dwellings plus eight “affordable” dwellings. However, re-development requires carefully restrained
visual impact due the prominent position of the site at the western gateway to the village of Rogate,
the historic character of nearby buildings and its accessible location within easy walking distance to
the village facilities, bus stops and retail outlets. The NP and local residents consider the site of
strategic importance and is appropriate for the LPA’s SHLAA for a limited quantum of smaller-sized
dwellings intended primarily for disadvantaged groups and for the open market. The site warrants a
more sympathetic, less developed and more integrated re-development than currently proposed,
provided it can unequivocally contribute to the alleviation to localised parking congestion and
flooding, and that measures for the safe crossing of the A272 are put in place. It is also recognised
that the site might provide useful parking within its scheme design (a key Parish concern as
evidenced by the NP Questionnaire and given the site’s strategic proximity to both Rogate shop and
school). It is therefore expected that any development on this site should incorporate appropriate
traffic and parking measures that help the wider village requirements.
Renault Garage site, Rogate in conjunction with CHI09, Field west of
Garbetts Lane and south of A272, Rogate.
Subject to a landscape impact assessment and formal study to consider the implications of any site
development to the Parish’s economy, the garage site is generally considered to be the Parish’s most
promising area of potential development, especially when it is added to the existing dwelling and
possibly the contiguous field. On its own, the field is considered inappropriate for any development
given access and “ribboning” issues.
Considering now the whole Renault garage site (the garage site, the triangular filed to its east and
the existing dwelling), the NP considers this an important strategic site that is at the eastern
entrance to Rogate village and conservation area and appropriate as a future development site. The
existing garage part of the site is, however, a rare example of a sustainable employment opportunity
within the area (although it is noted that the enterprise currently only employs a single individual
from within the Parish). The adjoining residential site is well contained and occupies a prominent
position between two public highways. It is not overlooked by neighbouring dwellings. The site is in
an accessible location within easy walking distance of the village facilities, bus stops and retail
outlets.
The NP considers this whole site appropriate for the LPA’s SHLAA. Residential development should
be carefully restrained in its visual impact due to the elevated position of the site and its position at
the front of Rogate village. The economic impact of any such development should be considered.
Furthermore, development should be contingent upon measures being implemented for the safe
crossing over the A272 including better cycle and pedestrian provision and appropriate car access at
its western end. In addition, if the whole site is developed then the western portion of the site
should include appropriate parking spaces (for those using village amenities). A further extension of
the site might conceivably incorporate the paddock and part garden of The Mews, Redhouse Court
making the garage/garage field/Redhouse paddock site a contiguous area as follows:
The inclusion of the paddock is, however, deemed difficult (and probably inappropriate) as it is likely
to lead to loss of green space, facilitate development that is too close to Garbetts Wood, lead to a
permanent change in the rural character of the Parish and loss of Parish special qualities, both of
which are overarching considerations for the NP.
Summary
Site number
Description
where
NP
assessment
CHI 04
Hugo Platt ground West
Rogate
Inappropriate
CHI 05
Field, N of Parsonage
Rogate
Inappropriate
CHI 06
Parsonage field S-West
Rogate
Inappropriate
CHI 07
Parsonage field South
Rogate
Inappropriate
CHI 08
W entrance, Parsonage
Rogate
Appropriate
CHI 09
Field, Garbetts/A 272
Rogate
Inappropriate
CHI 10
Garage units, Parsonage
Rogate
Appropriate
CHI 11
Field, Eastern edge
Rake
Inappropriate
CHI 12
Wooded site, east edge
Rake
Inappropriate
Non-SHLAA
1-4 Parsonage
Rogate
Appropriate
Non-SHLAA
Primrose lane/Flying Bull
Rake
Appropriate
Non-SHLAA
North of Rec Ground
Rogate
Inappropriate
Non-SHLAA
Infill, Fyning lane
Fyning
Inappropriate
Non-SHLAA
Clayton Court
Hillbrow
Appropriate
Non-SHLAA
Bull Hill/Jolly Drover
Hillbrow
Inappropriate
Non-SHLAA
Renault garage
Rogate
Appropriate